[Thought] Your life is your life...

The life's of others are always more tempting than your own but it is your own life you must live. Knowing the fails of others allows you to avoid making those mistakes the games we play must end. Friendships start and end the problem is not always someone else's but your own. One must learn to live with their mistakes to live..

The hunger problem

How do you know when you need to eat? You get hungry right? The physiological feeling of being hungry is not always when you are hungry but you know what it is because you have felt it before.

The problem is if this is a chemical imbalance what is making people really eat? Let us have an example, there is a boy born in a place without any animals about or other humans. The boy’s mum is dead. The baby it’s self has only ever eaten via its stomach. Forgetting the fact a baby would have very low chances of managing to survive on it’s own for a minute. How would the baby know to eat? Eating seems to be the absorbing of other things via the stomach and the baby will remember it from being inside his mother. But where does the baby get the urge to put things in its mouth? How does that link come about?

The idea of this is that if some how the baby still managed to get fed via the umbilical cord, which according to Wikipedia “supplies the fetus with oxygenated, nutrient-rich blood from the placenta. Conversely, the umbilical arteries return the deoxygenated, nutrient-depleted blood.” The problem is what is making things eat? There is nothing to relate to if all relation is removed.

The mouth is used to breathe why would anything risk damaging or blocking that to stop a feeling in the stomach? Without knowing about eating why would someone eat? The question is why would someone put food in a place so far away from the stomach? If there really is an urge to put food anything surely the rectum is nearer?

Is there something that inside really tells us where to eat? Is the fact we can swallow a hint? Also without teeth how would a baby guess it can brake up food? What I am saying is this is a problem that was over come early on but what if there is another reason we eat? What if there was a new hunger for something else? Would we know how to fill it?

[Thought] What is the professional way for something new?

If something is new, does that make everyone including the inventor amateur at it? If something unresearched but discovered by mistake does that make them professional I that area? What determines the title amateur or professional if what it is has not been seen before?

Regret and luck stems

A lot of people will say they have something to regret yet to regret is rarely thought about. An example, A young male aged 19, messing around trips over lands in the road and gets hit by a car. The young male is likely to regret messing around by the side of the road. Whether or not it is unlucky such action happened will be brought up later. Let’s continue the example and give the young male a name the young name is James, he wants to be a football player and is quite good. The day of the accident he was on his way practice. James never made it to practice because he was recovering in hospital. James found out he had damaged his leg and may not be able to play football as good as he did ever again. James was heart broken by this news knowing that because that one action his life had changed. Now James regrets that action because of his actions the outcome was tragic. Is it okay for him to regret that? The answer of yes is probable because he is still in hospital and the actions seem to be bad.

Now back to the example. James is now 25, and James is married and has a child on the way and a good job as a sales man. Does James still regret being stupid and tripping over into the road? The answer is again most likely yes. James believes he would have been a footballer if he had not had that accident. Let’s look a little more into James live, James is married to a girl called Joanna she is a 24 year old nurse and is currently having James’s child. Now for the point of this story, James met Joanna at hospital. The action of messing around by the road and changing his life does seem bad but yet he met the love of his life is happy and has no real damage from it. Does he still regret it?

I am sorry this story is not the best example but I feel the point is still viewable. To regret you are also regretting all actions that happened since the event you regretted. I regret a lot of single actions but I honestly feel that I have learned from most of the mistakes. Of course I would have preferred them to have no happened but the idea is you should learn to accept your decisions because you are living the result of them.

So where does luck come into this? Well was the action of being hit by the car unlucky or lucky? Would James have been a footballer or was he just going to fail like so many others at their dreams? For this we need to look at whether or not a group of actions on a whole can be classed as one stem of luck or a stem of bad luck. James was being stupid (his own actions may not be to do with luck), He tripped (bad luck?), he got hit by a car (bad luck?), he broke his leg and was unable to play football (bad luck?), he met the love of his life Joanna (good luck?), he managed to get his life back and get a good job (good luck?), he is now having a child with Joanna (good luck?). There is a lot of bad luck followed by good luck.

Does good luck and bad luck come in patterns or does it come in stems. The idea of a luck stem is something I thought about the other day. An action that one would consider bad luck may not be bad luck but part of good luck. Is there one set path, is there lots of paths and we decide our own path, or is there lots of paths that once finished new paths can begin. Even more likely do lots of paths happen at the same time? Can one path interact with another or is one stem of luck limited at one given time? To regret something are we regretting the stem of luck was choose?

Types of argument plus thoughts

There have been some comments that I do not back up my arguments on my site. I feel I should say something about it, seeing that my last three ideas for today’s posts failed…

Firstly I call what I say on here my theories, there for it is my theory. If it was an argument you would need a side to play, I do not have a side just saying one side. I talk about a lot on my site that I honestly feel could have/will/is happened/happen/happening. This does not mean I think it has/will/is happening just that I feel it could be happening.

I do feel I should read more theories and that it does look a lot more professional if you have ideas of other people to help with your ideas. Furthermore I feel that the quality of writing is better. Due to this being very short I will now write a few random thoughts at the bottom. This has been a idea of mine for a while now to have short thoughts just it is not very easy to make a post of something so short.

The following are thoughts:
Number 1:
If time travel is possible and we could create a machine to time travel how easy would it be to tell it where to go? We calculate our time around our sun the months, weeks, days and hours of our life time are calculated around that. But we are calculating it on something relative to us and not relative to the universe itself. Does that mean it would be harder to find the time we wanted? Although saying that if the machine could calculate what we thought one minute should be (our minute) it could calculate what the address was of that and work out the address of the other minutes.

Number 3: (this is not to be said to cause offence it was meant as a joke)
We all know what child abuse is but what is child use?

Number 4: let’s say for everything there are a right and a wrong. Somewhere in the universe for everything right to happen there is a wrong happening somewhere else. So if there has to be a right and a wrong, why is this sentence allowed? It talks about two things one is right and one is wrong yet if one has to be right and one has to be wrong then what’s stopping the wrong being right and the right being wrong and if this is right then half of the sentence it’s self is wrong making the sentence half wrong anyway right?

Number 5: With three things we are to know what to do next, those three things, what has happened, what was just happening and what is currently happening. With just that knowledge we have to use it to direct our path in life.

Return to lucidity and a session with the mirror

It has been a while since I had a lucid dream but Sunday morning I had two.
I was dreaming I was walking home after seeing Jo Jo the girl who helped me write the story last week. I was walking down my road when I noticed I was stepping further and higher than normal. I then decided to jump and went around 15 feet in the air. I realised I was dreaming and started to jump around each time going really high. This is not really normal for me as I tend to fly in lucid dreams. Looking around my road was sunny and I was crashing into people’s roofs braking slates and just enjoying myself.

I then thought I would go in my house but that failed and I woke up. Well I thought I did. I went to the bathroom to brush my teeth and get dressed. Looking in the mirror though I noticed I had longer hair and was already dressed. I looked in the mirror aware I was dreaming. I noticed a few weird things like motion was out. The mirror just didn’t keep up with what I was doing. When moving closer to the mirror I was further away in mirror. Looking close up I could see my face looked as if it was made of parts. Like when a movie has static it appeared to have a static when looking close up. My lips and eyes were all moving out of sync and at some times just changed completely to a new set of facial parts.

Just to double check I was dreaming I switched the light on and off and nothing happened. I then went back to the mirror. I tried to change my hair style and it failed it was almost as if I wasn’t looking at myself but more of an image that was distorted and still some how connected to my movement.

I then woke up. Laid there for a bit to try and remember it all. I have a few problems with the dream I had. The main being why did I check the light switch a second time? If I was really lucid I would not have needed to do that. Thinking about it even when I was jumping around earlier in the dream I normally fly and I still felt gravity in my dream. This has made me think something which I had thought of before. Did I have a lucid dream or did I dream I had one? If the latter is true then the conciseness is three layers thick. I have mine now which I use to write this. I lower level which was confused by the dream but then become aware and the level that thought he was in control by taking over from the lower level.

Over the last few weeks I have had three lines, three lives and just generally having the number three going around in my head. I think it was related to the whole launch of BBC Three when they were going on about three being the magic number. How ever over the last few weeks I thought what if the number three had something about it. This is not the first time three has appeared and will likely not be the last. What if we do have three layers of conciseness and we are only layer two? Or what if we are layer one?

Maybe I just had a lucid dream.

Holidays

This post is smaller than a normal post so I will also add a YouTube video that I really liked but did NOT make. The video and the theory are not the same. In the future I may post other videos I like.

Brakes, Holidays, vacations, leave, trips, rest or what ever one call’s them. They are time away from doing what one normally does. But is this really needed or required? The body to rest requires sleep and food to allow it to live. Yet people feel the need to have brakes and holidays for sometimes months at a time. Is there really a need to have a holiday? If there really is a need to have a holiday and it is required to be outside of the normal comfit zone then why do people go around the world? Excluding education and experience is there a real reason to go around the world?

This post is probably one of the mainly narrow minded posts I have written so far. The point is not that holidays are bad or that people should take them but more so that is there a real reason to going on holiday for months in some place you know nothing about? I view holiday’s abroad as an expense and something that does not really attract me. I see it as Spain will always be there if I want to go to Spain and say “I have been to Spain” I can go anytime and if I die before I do then I have not really missed out on anything as someone else has likely seen it and spread the word. What I am interested in doing is exploring places that no one has seen or even thinks possible. I don’t like the subject history yet I would love to time travel…

The internet is us

For ages I had the theory we was only five minutes old. This was based on the fact everything we know is from memories and there is no way of proving something is that old without relying on memory. People reading this is likely think of carbon dating or their wedding day etc. But those are memories if your wedding day did not happen or carbon dating was not invented you would not know. The problem is people remember hearing about such and such or even have done such and such. If such and such never happened and memory was faked then we wouldn’t know how to approach anything.

I am only twenty one if my memory is right this is the first time I have said my age on my blog. Every time I want to know something I look it up in the internet for that it is easy for me to relate to this theory. What if we created ourselves and the internet is us. We think and can easily prove things happened before the internet yet the internet was the beginning of time itself. This theory is very hard to believe and I have very little to argue it but think about the following movie similarly.

A movie is created with background, and a movie is created in that we can relate to the characters and quickly believe we know them. A television show can take it further and really build on this and show the characters to be more life like. A soap opera can build even more. Now think about this, what if we could create a way to insert the memory of knowing the people on the television into the minds of the viewers? No back story and no having to over explain the past to the viewer. The viewer would be able to relate to the characters as if they knew them in real life. With this kind of access to the memory of the viewer it may become harder to understand what is or is not real. Children pretending to an action character with full memory of that characters life. If ten years of memory of a fictional character could be implanted into a five year old child then why wouldn’t the child believe it was that fictional character? Surely the memory used in this situation would be third person and not first person but all the same it may allow problems to be caused.

Now getting back to the internet and how we are the internet. If someone was to create a world in which everyone inside it believed they was real. The best way to create that would be to create history and background to make the story more believable. If everyone was put on an empty world and told to create something out of nothing what is stopping them doing completely nothing? To improve the chances of the characters of this created world living and creating and solving the problems they are presented with the internet is granted to them. The internet, a resource where by they can access the knowledge presented by the greater power and fool the readers into thinking it was created by them. The internet allows the characters of this reality to commutate, learn, educate others and be entertained. There was so much before the internet wasn’t there?

Mixed Messages

Have you ever had that disorientation that comes from having a conversation or having a memory of a conversation that never happened? Maybe you were in a shop and the person was saying they sold an item only to say later the item doesn’t exist. This is not a conversation where they just changed their mind. This is a conversation where they said something but it was later reedited.

Thinking back to computer patches this could be a conversation that is bringing up deleted features. If these features were so big that it could trigger memories or thoughts about those lost features then conversations about them should be removed.

An example, a simulated world allows the people of that world to fly, then it seems flying is causing problems and is removed. Everyone still has memories of flying so that is removed, but flying is still very big and birds can trigger memories. To not have to remove birds and everything that flies conversations about people flying is just changed. These changes are very careful to only modify the general idea of the conversation and not remove all of it.

Next time you think you hear someone say something only for them to later tell you they didn’t consider what would be different if they did.

The patching process

Last week the idea that all humans are connected and that there may be a way of contacting each other by other unknown ways. This post is much like that only taking it one step further than even the internet has gone.

The internet is a network of devices mainly computers. There are a lot of people who wish that the internet will allow them to, check if their oven is on and be able to turn it off from work, check their garage door is locked, open and close windows around the house etc. This kind of control is very much like how much like what could happen with out network of humans.

Consider that this world is controlled from another world. Much that like computers can be remotely accessed but everything including the location of your mobile phone is controllable by this network. Now consider this. There is an ultimate truth that is hiding and being covered up completely.

Think of a program that is forever getting patched because errors are present. This program that we call reality is one of those programs forever being patched. The problem is some people are completely artificial and others are just like me and you real but a prisoner in this program.

I don’t know how the patching works but what I think does happen is that it happens very fast. I call it the bed sheet patching method. The error is made, and sheet is placed over it covering the error. The person who is going to get into the bed will not see anything and if they did see something then they would be told a lie and made to believe it. The person gets in and does not know anything about the error. The process happens fast and the person getting into bed does not remember anything about the error. Think about more and more sheets covering up this error. Now apply this process to a street. A window has a big sign saying the answer to life, that window is removed a new window is placed. The non-artificial people walk past and do not see anything and those that do will consider it impossible and accept anything to make what happened possible, or simply forget.

There are people who will disagree with everything to do with the truth and choose not to believe at all. There are some who are open minded and will accept the truth like me, and there are some that wants there to be a truth so much that they will make their own truth up even though it is false. Some people reading this may feel I am the latter but I consider the latter as people who may be classed as having schizophrenia or some other mental health disorder. I do however feel they may know something they could be learnt or saw an error but tried ever so hard to remember it.

If you become aware of the process you will see an error and you will know the error is an error but 5 minutes later you will completely forget it. Even if you try to write it down you go “what was that?” and have forgotten it. I feel there must be a way to remember these errors and learn the truth.

The inter-network of the human race and the delay

In computer games there is a slight delay between the pressing of the button and action on the screen. There is still even a delay on the human body, when the brain tells the fingers to type or the eyes read, and there is a slight delay. This delay we know about but what if there was another delay? Charles Darwin said that all life on this world is related. We are all related to one another and yet each so unique. An earlier post of my related to wireless minds in that we are all controlled wirelessly, and this post will build on that.

Consider the internet as lots of computer inter-networked together to form the internet. Each computer has its own IP address and each IP address can be sub networked to allow more than one computer to work on the same network. Much like how a most homes have two computers and both can be online at the same time. They are likely to use a router and both have the same IP address. People can upgrade their computers and change components allow friends on their network etc. Now consider that the human race is the same. The human race is a group of computers inter-networked together. If a person has a child then that child is added to the network. If someone dies they leave the network. Each computer has memory to allow it to remember its relations to past events, and use it to help calculate how to handle current tasks. Much like how a human brain works.

So what has delay in computer games and computer networking got to do with anything? What if there this delay could be come larger or shorter? In networking it is called latency which is the delay between devices on a network. There is very little delay between devices on a computer which is limited by the speed of the motherboard bus speed. The brain calculates tasks much faster than any computers today, but still has to process these tasks. This processing means there is a delay. If going back to my previous post about wireless minds as well as how Darwin said we all related. If the human race is some how linked together, then there surely would be a delay.

Let us consider that all humans are inter-networked what could possibly be gained? The Internet allows entertainment, education, news and business possibilities. What are the gains of all humans linked together? The answer is maybe not as clear because we are only thinking of humans being linked together. What if every life form on the planet was linked together? We can commutate by sound and visions so why not by some other link? For computers to talk to one another a protocol is required for humans to commutate with one another and other life forms a protocol may be required.

I have a typing speed of only 70 words pre minute which is much slower than people who use computers less than I do. It was this that helped me come up with this theory. I thought what if everything we do is being delayed and the ones with the fast connections can do things faster than the ones without. Think of the possibilities if we could learn a protocol talk commutate without talking to not only humans!

Confabulation to prevent the truth

Consider if you will that this would that you a living in is not real. Various movies and theories have talked about this world not being all that there is. Even Plato in his cave analogy talked about what we see and experience only being part of what is really happening. But this theory is not the simulated world theory. This theory is an argument given what could happen and the mistakes that could be noticed there should be a way of cleaning it up.

Have you ever done something that someone else knows about but you wish they would just forget? Think about it in a larger scale what if the world had errors and mistakes. What if people could remember those errors and mistakes? Think in terms of computer games when a mistake or a problem is detected, the game company makes a patch or fix. This fixes the problem. Any new gamers would never see that error. But old gamers and new gamers that talk would learn about the mistakes. What about features that was once present but then removed? If the game is making constant mistakes then the game is not very convincing. Getting back to our reality if people became aware of that lack of this world and gained real prove that something else existed, then the reality around us would fall apart. We have the ability to learn and we have the ability to learn that this is not real. What if the mistakes and past features have been removed but are still very much happened. Consider this, humans had the ability to cast spells and magic, this was becoming a problem as humans could cause real damage to the reality around them. This feature was removed and all memory that was associated with it was changed or deleted. Books written about magic were re-classed as fiction, and people who managed to still believe were classed as crazy.

Whole lives could be changed and no one would ever know. The student theory, a student is very bad at exams and never reads or revises, having the ability to confabulate own memories. The student makes fake memories of having always read a book before an exam. When an exam is near the student will always remember reading a whole book before the exam and will relate to it being normal. The student will read a whole book before the exam. This could cause some problems. Such as if the student could not read very well could whole knowledge of reading be invented? What about how long before the exam should the student start reading? These problems would have to be ironed out. The student may become aware of certain problems with own memory. But what if the student could kind of remember what if the student could gain access to the real memories where no books were read? This new student would not be so perfect anymore.

If there are ways of accessing forgotten memories or becoming aware of this process then how could it be done? If something seems wrong then try hard to remember the last time it happened. Write down and make notes any aid to memory should work. But to gain access to this process will likely require some other ability. But if the world around you is not convincing enough to make you believe it is real, is it real? If it is then why is it not convincing?

A right to die

This post I have wanted to write for a long time. The reasons behind why I did not will become clear to you. Where my argument differs with most is that I have included depression as a reason for euthanasia. This is not meant to mean people who are simply feeling down, but more about people who are feeling down for months and have tried to work out their problems.

Imagine a world where if one is ill, disabled, too old, or simply living a life not worth living. They could go and sign up to be humanely put to death. Euthanasia, the act of killing someone or oneself painlessly, is a hard idea to debate. Should anyone who does not want to live be forced to live? Should they be forced to die in a painful way if they are ill? Should they be forced to have to result in painful unrehearsed ways of killing their self? By making euthanasia illegal and giving no one a way out of their troubled unwanted life. What ever the reasons surely they should be considered? What about people dying and thermally ill? Those people are not even allowed to end their own life. The only option they have is to ask not to be resuscitated if they do die.

Who chooses who can die and who can’t? If it was as easy as to go into a suicide booth and pay a fee or even for free, there would be a lot of people rushing into it. There would be young men/women who have broken up with their loved ones, or have lost people important to them. There may even be people who are simply bored and fancy trying it out. Whatever the reason that people have there should be a way of preventing people who could have their problems solved.

Sign up to die, suppose of a register that people who are ill get put up closer to the top than people who simply want to die because their dog has died. People who wish to end their life would put their name down and upon doing so would have to talk to a counsellor and part take in therapy. At times whist on the waiting list there would be check ups. Should the person wish to no longer kill themselves then they will be removed from the list. Should the feelings come back they would return to their place in the list. This is to prevent people saying on the list simply because they do not wish to start the process again. There should however be a minimum time spent on the list. Someone who wishes to stay alive on the day they would have been killed. They should have to go back slightly on the list. The problem is the list should not be too long or people would simply not bother with it at all. All people on that list should be added to the organ donor list to ensure their death is a help to others.

Currently there are a large amount of people who choose to commit suicide and end up doing it in painful and distressing ways. Hanging, this if done wrong can leave a person in pain for over 20 minutes, or even can cause the person to become decapitated. Slitting the wrists, this is painful, messy and not always successful. This can sometimes leave the person with ugly scars which will forever remind them and others of their failure to take their own life. Drowning, this is painful, not always successful.
These are just some of the ways people choose to kill themselves and we have not even talked about the ways where they could endanger others such as driving or gun related suicides. Should someone who has wanted to commit suicide for a long time really be given no nice option?

I did have more to write but feel this enough and welcome the unfriendly comments on their post. Below is a quote and some links for further reading.

Quote from Wikipedia “The closest thing to a suicide booth to have been actually constructed is the "Euthanasia Machine" invented by Philip Nitschke, consisting of software titled "Deliverance", which asks the patient a series of questions, and automatically administers a lethal injection if the correct answers are made. The system and questions are so constructed that the supplier of the machine cannot be held responsible for ending the life of the patient, who takes responsibility by operating it.”

Links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bag
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_booth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_device
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide

And for those who don’t like Wikipedia links:
http://www.textfiles.com/magazines/IBFT/ibft038.txt Various ways to kill oneself.
http://aelinik.free.fr/suicide.htm
http://www.finalexit.org/
http://www.peacefulpillhandbook.com/

What makes you who you are?

Would you still be you if you could not remember anything? What is it that makes you who you are? If a bad man loses his memory does he forget to be a bad man? If a good man loses his memory does he forget to be a good man?

If a lot of what we do is related to what we have done, then surely if we cannot remember doing anything, we cannot relate to anything. It would then be easy to presume that one would not be able to know what to do.

What makes us what we are? When we see a gun we relate to it being a weapon. So if we did not remember what a gun was we would not be able to relate the fear required for it. The same could go for people we would not know who is our friend or who is our enemy. But does this mean someone with amnesia can completely change who they are or just who they are in relation to other things?

What causes someone to be good or bad? Is it upbringing? Is it genetic? If it is upbringing then if amnesia can remove all memories of upbringing would a bad person turn good?

On a side note though, I think it is amazing though that in movies when people have amnesia they still remember how to talk English and walk etc. This is likely due to them remembering basic things just not anything else.

Retro Cognition with replacement (TTTP7 Revisit ones own timeline + TTTP8 Revisit ones own ancestry)

Having not posted a time travel theory for a while I thought I would write a spin off. This theory revisits TTTP7 Revisit ones own timeline plus it talks about the possible next theory TTTP8 Revist ones own ancestry. But it should be noted this is not a time travel theory on its own. This is more of an ability someone could gain.

Ever had regrets that you wish you could change? What if you could go back or see the future mistakes your about to make?

Retro Cognition is the ability to remember or have some idea of recall of past events. My earlier post “Post-cognition or retrocognition” talked about this. But what if we could go back and then place ourselves back there? What if we could return and relive all the moments.

Like I said above this is not really a time travel theory because, the person may not really be time travelling. They may really just be getting precognition. The time traveller can travel but only back to the start of the memory gained from their post-cognition state.

So what is this theory about? Well an example is really required here so here it is, a man is aged 30 when he was 29 he broke up with his wife and lost his kids. He realises he can remember the last year or two in perfect detail. He tries to remember where it all started. Whist remembering it he then goes back to that time to when he was just 29. Where this differs from TTTP7 is that he now has full memory of the next year.

Why would this happen? Well we go into Parallel universes again and a reason for this happening is because the ability of post-cognition is rather close to precognition. The ability of precognition should not always be classed as precognition. If the access to precognitive thoughts is limited to a one time line and ends are a certain age. An example would be the guy in our earlier example; he would not have access to any events after he was 30 and would not know anything about the results of changes he makes.

So why does this have TTTP8 features? If the post-cognition memory span was capable of going farther than that of the life of the person with the ability, it may be possible for them to have access to the life and make changes to things before they was even born. There has to be some limitation to this ability such as which parent/grandparent is accessible and if they can take control over other people’s bodies is it part of another ability all together?

I can understand if this theory is hard to read and if I am honest I did not really want to post this theory. I do however have nothing else to post and I wanted to post something today.

A Christmas in Utopia

This theory is based in a world without money, without unemployment and without debt. The country will be called Utopia. Although the following is closer to a dystopia world, in this world no one has ever known any better. This means that the world is all they know. There are no other countries that they know of.

Utopia is very controlled country. There is no war, no hunger, no debt, no money and no unemployment. The government control employment, leisure, child birth, food, transport, religion and relationships. All people of Utopia are allocated supplies and a place to live. When a male in Utopia reaches 21 he is made available for women. When a woman in Utopia reaches 18 she is made available for men. The relationships are fixed no interracial or same sex relationships are allowed. When a male and a female feel they are compatible the female is to move in with the male and her property if her parents are not living there is made available for new people. The male and the female are then allowed to one successful child birth. By this the male is taken to a clinic where he is to donate semen and the woman is then impregnated with that semen. Only one child pre couple is allowed in built up parts of Utopia. In other parts of Utopia depending on certain factors such as IQ, the couple’s trade and the population where they are living, additional children may be allowed. If a woman falls pregnant without permission her child is aborted and DNA taken to determine the father, who is then charged with illegal intercourse.

Crime is very controlled if someone is charged with something they are moved to a prison county and taken away from their family. In the prison county there are no relationships and people are made to work harder than before. If people refuse or do not comply they are charged with failure to support the community and sent to death. The laws are very strict and freedom is limited in Utopia.

When someone is born they are schooled and educated in the ways of live in Utopia. They are controlled and not allowed to be free. When they reach 16 the males get 4 years forced work in the police forces. There is no army as there is only one country and there has never been a war. Women when they reach 16 will learn a trade suited best to them. Women are banned from working in the forces or gaining access to high jobs. A woman is likely to become a nurse or work producing clothing or child care. Some women who were unable to find a partner might be classed as worthless and forced to work as a servant. Women when pregnant were not allowed to work and when the child was born could only work during schooling times. Men after they left the police would be given the option to continue and stay in the police or begin to work as something else. In the police they would be educated in other trades to help them when they leave. The government would put people in jobs that they was best at.

But what about Christmas in Utopia how would Christmas be? Well there is no Christmas in Utopia. Quite simply in the world created there is no Jesus and as a result no Christmas day to celebrate his birthday. That does not mean there are not holidays just not the holidays that are present in our world.

So what would Christmas be like in this Utopia of world? Well let me explain how holidays work in Utopia. Considering the fact that a holiday would be like a massive day off for so many people, the world of Utopia does not have holidays as such. Birthdays are celebrated as a holiday for the birthday person. On a persons birthday in Utopia they are given the day off of work. This is the only time of the year they are given a day off without having to choose.

The birthday holiday is as close to Christmas as there is in Utopia. They do not celebrate New Years as to them there is no start or end of the year, other than their birthday. So the birthday holiday is both New Year and their birthday in one. The start of the year is the same as their date of birth. There is still days and months just nothing to say December is the last month. There is one problem which makes it unlike Christmas or New Years in that friends and family’s birthdates are likely to be different, and as such no holidays. Because pregnancy is regulated most people try to make sure their babies are born close to their parent’s birthdays. A normal birthday holiday is spent with family who ask for a day off. The day starts with another family member cooking for the birthday person. There is no alcohol as all substances that can cause impairment to a person’s ability to work are outlawed. So they eat a meal and enjoy the company around them. People wish them a happy new year as for the birthday person it is a new year. On their birthday they are given access to extra food and drinks to be able to entertain.

This was originally going to be part of a set of stories but in the end merged into one. I was tempted to call it “A Christmas in Dystopia” although I feel that this world would work. It would work because everyone would be under the control of the government. The government would have full power and the human or who ever race it has would work like machines. This means from a government point of view this is a utopian world. The problem is the people of this world would not really enjoy life much. I mean a world where everything required is given to you is not really the perfect world. People enjoy choice people enjoy the ability to say yes and say no. For a government to be able to tell what people can and cannot do is for the person to lose self choice. Personal choice to drink or buy more food, pick your job go on holiday. All these allow a person to experience the best of life. If the lives of everything is restricted to allow everyone equal life, there is no individuality. People should be allowed to choose their own path in life not follow a set example. Christmas is an example of a set event. People year after year enjoy Christmas not because they know the story but because everyone else does. This is proof enough that with choice people does not necessarily mean they will chose to cause problems. The choices in which someone causes problems or does not help society should not be forced but educated otherwise. Merry Christmas and the lesson hear if not very clear is to not preach your ways to others unless their ways are causing pain to others including you!

Ever had a memory and not known where it came from?

Ever had that feeling that you remember buying something or that you did something once, but don’t really remember doing it? What about remembering the actions of someone else when it was impossible for them to have done it? Where do these memories come from? Are they from dreams? Is it déjà vu?

What if you were seeing a memory from another world? What if you were seeing what another you were doing in another world? If this is true then what could you learn from this? If you really are seeing or accessing the memory of another version of yourself you need to be sure you really are. False memories are called confabulation and if it is truly possible for you to access the memories from another world there may be some use.

If every possibility is played out then knowing what other versions of you have done may be valuable. Think of the mistakes other versions of you may have made? What if you could remember those mistakes and ensure you do not do the same?

Let us have an example, a man goes into a shop and buys coke. On leaving the shop he opens the bottle of coke and then trips over and spills it all over himself. This is sticky and the man is in a rush so cannot get changed. If another version of this man could access the memory of spilling the coke then he could buy another drink such as water.

But this would only be possible with access to the future knowledge and not knowing the present. If this ability is possible surely only present actions would be viewable? Which would prevent accessing the mistakes of other versions? A simple answer to this question is, what would have happened if you were born a year earlier? Sure there would be changes such as different food being ate in pregnancy different birthdates different so many things that it would be near impossible for you to be completely the same till you went in a shop and bought water or coke. But if there was infinite number of parallel universes where everything is played out, then it is possible. The problem is more about how access to these memories is possible.

This is one way it could work. Every universe has neighbours such as neighbours of flats, so you can hear what is going on in the neighbour’s flats. Now the rule of this listening in is that you can only hear the thoughts/memories of your other self. If you managed to be lucky enough that a parallel universe with another you was right next to your universe, you may be able to listen in.

Having all these values right may be hard and gains are not very clear. This does not make it impossible but may make knowing the advantages hard. Just in future if you remember something that might have happened but did not. Do not just forget about it for it may be a memory from another world.

Dual or multiple time lines

This post is a theory I have had for a long time and featured it briefly in my journal I wrote for university.

We view time as a linear line. We see time as a process of something happening and the ability to know something having a start and an end. We view time as the morning the afternoon the evening the night. But what if the time was both the morning and the afternoon for the same person at the same moment?

Imagine that time is not just one line but more like a zig zag or river like. This would mean that there is not one thing happening at one time but lots of things. The birth of person could be happening at the same time as his first day at school, his wedding and his death. All these would be happening at the same time but just different parts of river. This is multiple time lines.

What about a dual time line? We understand and view time in a linear line. What if there was more than one thing happening. What if we had two view points in time? We could already have two view points and just not be aware of them. They might not be aware of each other.

Think about this, every moment has already happened. The moment where you are reading this is just one moment. One thinks it is linear only because when starting a new “moment block” one starts with the memory of the previous block. Therefore you see the world in a linear fashion. But just seeing the world in this fashion does not mean it is linear. Think of a grid of 16x16 “moment blocks” or “memory blocks”. All the moments could be put into the gird into any order. The result would not be out of order because each time a new moment is started the memory from the last one is blanked and at the start of the block it had the preceding information. Using this logic it may even be possible to say that nothing has ever happened and what is remembered is only remembered because it was told at the start of the block. This could even mean that the universe is just made up of moment blocks and they are in no order what so ever. Think about a movie the start the middle and the end. The movie is like one block and one view of that block. If there were lots of blocks all being viewed at the same time but by different people there would be no reason to think someone else is watching another block unless one knew about it.

So what could be gained from this? Well for one if we are viewing all points at the same time of our life, then if we can become aware of the other view points we can see into the future/past. If we are not viewing but living in a river timeline we may be able to, jump on the bank and back in the river, so to speak. This would enable one to travel into different moments. Just because we view time from one angle does not mean it is what we see. Viewing a three dimensional object from one angle can make it look two dimensional. Just because time looks linear does not mean it is.

Fourth Dimension

First dimension, forwards and backwards, second dimension, left and right, third dimension, up and down. But what about the fourth dimension? Is it time? Is there something else?
In a one dimensional world nothing can move left or right.
In a two dimensional world nothing can move up or down.
In a three dimensional world nothing can move….?
What would movement in the fourth dimension be? The fourth dimension to some people is considered time. Time is a movement that allows other movement. Without time movement in the other dimensions would not be possible. But what if there was another dimension of movement? Let us pretend time is the fifth dimension and the fourth is something else.
In a two dimensional world nothing can move up or down, so a three dimensional object would effetely disappear when moving up or down. Using this logic a four dimensional object would appear invisible when travelling in the forth dimension. The human body is three dimensions are we have eyes that can see two dimensions with depth to allow semi three dimensional sight. We cannot see all three dimensions, what if two dimensional objects can only see one dimensions. Using this logic we can presume that a four dimensional object with visual sight can see three dimensions.

Four one dimensional lines linked together form a two dimensional object as in a square. Six squares linked together form a three dimensional cube. Again using this logic what would happen if cubes formed together? The answer has been named on Wikipedia and Teamikaria. The answer on Wikipedia was Tesseract and means an eight cell cube. The answer on Teamikaria was a cubinder. Some of these shapes are pretty scary such as the Duocylinder when seen rotating. Is this because they are impossible or just impossible in our world?

Shadows from a two dimensional object are a line or a one dimensional object. Shadows from a three dimensional object are two dimensional. Again using this logic it would a safe to presume that a four dimensional object would project a three dimensional shadow.

All the above is just ideas to think about. What if there is another dimension and we just cannot see it or sense it. Our three dimensional objects cannot sense a fourth dimension because they just are not made to sense it. What if we learned to travel into the fourth dimension would we just disappear?

In my opinion the fourth dimension is the inside and outside. But of a fourth dimensional object. What if we could travel in and out of our world? Think of a line then give that line another line crossing into it. That line is not a cross. That is now two dimensions now move a line up and down from it. The line is now three dimensions. Now draw another line through the inside and out the other side. The result cannot be achieved. The idea is that if something could go inside and outside we could not see that object travelling inside or outside just know it had. I do not understand it myself and it is my opinion.

Future reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_dimension
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesseract
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duocylinder
http://teamikaria.com/hddb/classic/

A theory of the beginning

This came to me over the last few years in bits and pieces and seems to fit together. I have always had some weird thought that knowing the past is one step towards knowing the future. That past cognition is as good as post cognition. The following is what I came up with over time.

In the beginning there was an end. Although seemingly impossible there was an end. The end was caused by man. The human race kept expanding and expanding in this universe. They discovered a way to create another world. The human race discovered a way to play god and to create a fully living world. The world and worlds they created had fully populated humans living and breathing. They discovered a way for them to go into these worlds. Out of the world they was god in the world they was just a normal person. The human race was able to move into these worlds at the time of the destruction of the universe. The problem with this was that if their universe ended the world they hid inside would also end. So they started to create another universe from within this world that they had created. This universe was created and that universe grew to become the one your in now. This universe is the universe that will end. The loop goes on and on and on. But if at the very start there is a universe about to end then surely like dominos they will all start to kill them all off? The answer is that it is what has caused this universe. For we will not create this universe we will create the reason and the cause. This universe started with a bang and the bang was caused by us and the end of last universe. We cannot create ourselves but our creation will create us.

So what does this mean and how is this possible. There are a few things that can cause problems. One is that for this theory to work time is looping and not linearly. If time is linearly and is looping then time is set. Time has a set line that will repeat forever. So what about religion? It is not to say religion is wrong as and religion is still possible. If changes are slightly made in this theory such as they managed to leave a message in the universe saying it was created and the messiah will take us to the new world. This story still works. What if we are the new world? What if we are where the prophet will take us? What if the savour of mankind is just a normal person and will create this world that we will go to. Is there a god? Well yes but god is anyone who creates the world.

What is reality? Reality is the loop. The meaning of life is to live in the loop and to make it work. Is there free will? There is free will but only to stay in the loop. For the end has been set as was the beginning but this does not mean the middle has been. Ever had that feeling you were hear before? Déjà vu is the feeling you have been here before. What if the reason for déjà vu is because you have lived this moment before? This theory explains the feeling of us not being in the real world as well as having past lives. What if we can change some things but unlimitedly everything is set. There are points in time that will forever happen, JFK getting shot or 9/11 etc. What if these moments are fixed but your life is not