On August 7, 2009
At 12hr 34 minutes and 56 seconds on the 7th of August this year, the time and date will be
12:34:56 07/08/09
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
This will never happen in your life again?
Thursday, 6 August 2009
Monday, 3 August 2009
Errors in reality
Ever had that thought that something was there then it was not? Maybe the thought that you would have to do a job only to find it completed. What if you really did need to do that job or what you thought you saw was really there? An example would be a cleaner is mopping the floor he has just mopped the floor and has the bucket of water to chuck out. He looks at the water and there is no water. He would think that maybe he used up all the water on the floor. If he goes to ask anyone they might think he is stupid or just forgetful. What if for some unknown reason the water was not there because of an error in reality.
It could be a few things why there is no water, he could have emptied the water and forgot, someone else could have managed to empty it, and he managed to use all of the water up mopping the floor. These are the things that people would say because it is believable and we can relate to it. We can prove those actions can cause an empty mop bucket. What about other reasons? What if the bucket sided from a parallel universe where he had already emptied it? Cannot be proven but could have happened. What if a ghost sucked up all the water? Again not likely to be proven but could have happened.
What about another example, a guy is walking down the road and thinks he will walk today to work and not get on the bus. Later he hears about the bus crash. Is it just luck? Does luck exist? How can luck exist? Can it be proven? No it was just a coincidence. What if it was not though? What if the reason he did not get on the bus was because of a message telling him not to. Or what if he was never meant to get on the bus and the decision to get on or off was already made.
What this theory is about as it may not be very clear from the above is that there could be errors or mistakes that we so very easily pass off as normal. The errors might be massive what if there was an extra colour but my mistake it was the same colour as blue? Everything would look blue and no one would notice. What this theory means there could be errors around us and we are so used to them we just pass them off.
What does this all mean? Well not much but think about it like a dream, ever had a dream where you are in a world that looks perfect and does not feel like a dream only to awake and realise there is loads of errors and things wrong. Maybe if we become more aware of these errors we can remember what we are meant to be doing. Maybe the meaning of life is just forgotten by us all and we may have a chance of remembering it. It is up to you whether or not you believe this is it. It is your reality just look around and maybe more willing to accept there could be more the reality then we know. If more than one colour was blue maybe the sky has big words going across saying YOU ARE NOT REAL! Only like invisible ink we can’t see it.
EDIT:
One of these errors may have shown themselves to me just after writing this entry. I tried to phone up to get my PAC code for my mobile phone. I phoned up (50p credit used) then asked for the pac code they started to give me it. I got to *****7 then got cut off. checked my signle and it was 1 bar just just thought I had been cut off. Phoned again and as soon as the guy said 7 cut off again. This is a coincidence right?..
It could be a few things why there is no water, he could have emptied the water and forgot, someone else could have managed to empty it, and he managed to use all of the water up mopping the floor. These are the things that people would say because it is believable and we can relate to it. We can prove those actions can cause an empty mop bucket. What about other reasons? What if the bucket sided from a parallel universe where he had already emptied it? Cannot be proven but could have happened. What if a ghost sucked up all the water? Again not likely to be proven but could have happened.
What about another example, a guy is walking down the road and thinks he will walk today to work and not get on the bus. Later he hears about the bus crash. Is it just luck? Does luck exist? How can luck exist? Can it be proven? No it was just a coincidence. What if it was not though? What if the reason he did not get on the bus was because of a message telling him not to. Or what if he was never meant to get on the bus and the decision to get on or off was already made.
What this theory is about as it may not be very clear from the above is that there could be errors or mistakes that we so very easily pass off as normal. The errors might be massive what if there was an extra colour but my mistake it was the same colour as blue? Everything would look blue and no one would notice. What this theory means there could be errors around us and we are so used to them we just pass them off.
What does this all mean? Well not much but think about it like a dream, ever had a dream where you are in a world that looks perfect and does not feel like a dream only to awake and realise there is loads of errors and things wrong. Maybe if we become more aware of these errors we can remember what we are meant to be doing. Maybe the meaning of life is just forgotten by us all and we may have a chance of remembering it. It is up to you whether or not you believe this is it. It is your reality just look around and maybe more willing to accept there could be more the reality then we know. If more than one colour was blue maybe the sky has big words going across saying YOU ARE NOT REAL! Only like invisible ink we can’t see it.
EDIT:
One of these errors may have shown themselves to me just after writing this entry. I tried to phone up to get my PAC code for my mobile phone. I phoned up (50p credit used) then asked for the pac code they started to give me it. I got to *****7 then got cut off. checked my signle and it was 1 bar just just thought I had been cut off. Phoned again and as soon as the guy said 7 cut off again. This is a coincidence right?..
Friday, 31 July 2009
TTTP4 Time travel is unnoticeable
This theory assumes that what has been set has been set and therefore cannot be changed. Events once they have happened can only be observed not changed because they are set. Think of it more of a video that time has recorded. Everything whist is being recorded is changeable but once done cannot be changed.
Example, a time traveller wants to go back in time to ask an earlier version of himself something. The time traveller goes back in time and visits himself earlier that week. Because he did not meet himself earlier that week and get asked about something the time travellers earlier self would not see him. The time traveller could only observe but not change anything.
Another example, a robber plans to rob a shop he makes himself be seen by talking to some police officers at the time he plans to go back to. He then goes back and tries to rob the shop. The shop was not robbed so he cannot even move objects.
Example, a time traveller wants to go back in time to ask an earlier version of himself something. The time traveller goes back in time and visits himself earlier that week. Because he did not meet himself earlier that week and get asked about something the time travellers earlier self would not see him. The time traveller could only observe but not change anything.
Another example, a robber plans to rob a shop he makes himself be seen by talking to some police officers at the time he plans to go back to. He then goes back and tries to rob the shop. The shop was not robbed so he cannot even move objects.
This theory means everything is set and recorded time travellers can time travel but only to observe. This would explain Steven Hawking’s theory of the lack of tourists. It would also mean people could go back in time and witness crimes but not prevent them. This would also mean people could solve problems such as who was Jack the Ripper and what happened at the start of time. The time traveller may or may not be able to open doors or may even be able to go through them as the time traveller would not have physical form there.
The traveller may or may not be able to walk through temporary object such as doors. By temporary it is meant that because a door can be open at one moment in time and closed at another it is more temporary than that of say a wall that may be there for some years. If the traveller can walk through doors then it would explain the issue of being able to get from one room to another without moving objects through doors etc.
This theory would mean that police would have the ability to view crimes with out preventing them. People could see famous events in history such as listening to Beethoven or witnessing events. This would allow people go see any point in history with out changing history. This theory has its down sides by lack of privacy. As well as the feeling of being unable to change something that has happened. One may go and visit loved ones that had died and feel helpless because they are unable to change them dying. One may even go back and witness people’s deaths and feel helpless. What is unknown is what would happen if a traveller would have a heart attack or die whist travelling in time? Would the traveller’s body ever been found or would it forever be lost in time. The next theory TTTP5 Time Recorder talks more the ability of recording time.
The traveller may or may not be able to walk through temporary object such as doors. By temporary it is meant that because a door can be open at one moment in time and closed at another it is more temporary than that of say a wall that may be there for some years. If the traveller can walk through doors then it would explain the issue of being able to get from one room to another without moving objects through doors etc.
This theory would mean that police would have the ability to view crimes with out preventing them. People could see famous events in history such as listening to Beethoven or witnessing events. This would allow people go see any point in history with out changing history. This theory has its down sides by lack of privacy. As well as the feeling of being unable to change something that has happened. One may go and visit loved ones that had died and feel helpless because they are unable to change them dying. One may even go back and witness people’s deaths and feel helpless. What is unknown is what would happen if a traveller would have a heart attack or die whist travelling in time? Would the traveller’s body ever been found or would it forever be lost in time. The next theory TTTP5 Time Recorder talks more the ability of recording time.
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Science could be wrong
Most of what we know and teach is by science. Science most of the time is accurate. There have been times when science was wrong though. Cigarettes were said to help with a number of things including asthma because the understanding of them in science was wrong. (Discovery.com, Cures that didn’t work No. 8). More on that is lobotomy Cure No. 4, Walter Freeman performed hundreds of lobotomies including on the former President’s sister Rosemary Kennedy (before he was the President) (Wikipedia). This means that doctors then would tell you with the same confidence they tell you about any other risky operation that you could make a full recovery. My point is not that science is all wrong but science could be wrong and has made loads of mistakes.
Isaac Newton was not the first person to get the idea of gravity but his famous apple story is the one that sticks in the mind of a lot of people including myself. What if Isaac Newton was holding a helium balloon at the time? I mean helium goes up and apples go down. Would he have adapted his theory and said heavy objects fall and very light ones rise? What would have been the answer? The idea that science is what we use to back all of our ideas and the theories we have makes us better is not really right. Science makes mistakes and science is just simply ideas that can be recreated and recorded to have happened.
How can science prove anything it does not know? The live on the moon say. All of life is meant to have started from something very small. What if life on the moon started differently and that is why science has not found any. I am not saying there is life on the moon and I honestly hope there is not life any where in the universe. It backs up my theory of this being a simulated universe as well as Nick Bostrom’s theory. Just think science could be wrong about something. Lobotomies were done hundreds of times before they were found to not be that useful. I should note there is meant to be still a good reason for a lobotomy to be performed.
Further reading
Top 10 science mistakes
http://science.discovery.com/top-ten/2009/science-mistakes/science-mistakes.html
Top 10 cures that didn’t work
http://science.discovery.com/top-ten/2009/cures/cures.html
Interesting Wikipedia pages
Rosemary Kennedy
Walter_Freeman
Lobotomy
Isaac Newton was not the first person to get the idea of gravity but his famous apple story is the one that sticks in the mind of a lot of people including myself. What if Isaac Newton was holding a helium balloon at the time? I mean helium goes up and apples go down. Would he have adapted his theory and said heavy objects fall and very light ones rise? What would have been the answer? The idea that science is what we use to back all of our ideas and the theories we have makes us better is not really right. Science makes mistakes and science is just simply ideas that can be recreated and recorded to have happened.
How can science prove anything it does not know? The live on the moon say. All of life is meant to have started from something very small. What if life on the moon started differently and that is why science has not found any. I am not saying there is life on the moon and I honestly hope there is not life any where in the universe. It backs up my theory of this being a simulated universe as well as Nick Bostrom’s theory. Just think science could be wrong about something. Lobotomies were done hundreds of times before they were found to not be that useful. I should note there is meant to be still a good reason for a lobotomy to be performed.
Further reading
Top 10 science mistakes
http://science.discovery.com/top-ten/2009/science-mistakes/science-mistakes.html
Top 10 cures that didn’t work
http://science.discovery.com/top-ten/2009/cures/cures.html
Interesting Wikipedia pages
Rosemary Kennedy
Walter_Freeman
Lobotomy
Monday, 27 July 2009
The unexplainable
How does one explain seeing something completely new and different to anyone else? If we could explore another world where there were more colours, more senses, more well everything. How could we explain this to anyone when we came back? How do you explain a new colour with out relating to an already present colour? How do you talk about a world that is more than three dimensions? The answer is with great difficulty. We only know what our world has shown us. We find it very hard to relate to things we do not already know.
Let me give an example. A teacher is teaching a new system to a group of students. The teacher knows that the students have never used the system before and know nothing about it. The teacher will use lots of relations to already present knowledge the students know. The students know when they want something to happen something needs to be started, so the teacher would say to start the system we would do this. With out the knowledge of starting how would this be done? For this we can relate to pre school teaching. A teacher will teach the children about colours and words by breaking it up into very small parts such as showing cards with different colours and letters on them. This very basic teaching may or may not be needed to learn about something completely new.
We know the colour green is blue and yellow mixed together. A colour that does not exist in our reality may require additional colours. We only know the colours and how the colours are seen to use. If the lighting is different the colours are different. We know green is green because when we was young we was shown something that looked like it was green and we remembered its name. We do not know if everyone’s visual perception of the colour is the same. What if an extra colour was introduced into this new world that one could visit? How could someone explain it? One might ask if the colour like red or green. Well no because it is a completely new colour.
Science may say this is impossible to have an extra colour because it is all to do with wavelengths and such. We need to remind ourselves science is all guess work that has been proven to be true more than once. Science is making excuses to how stuff happened and that is all very well but it is not telling us the big answers we want to know like why are we here? Let us leave science to another post and get off of colour as well. Say you went to another world and this world was made out of what looked like crayons. The entire world is made out of little strips that colours that look like crayons. Trees are made out of tree scales that look like fish scales. The floor is solid and something out of a cartoon. How do you explain someone that world with out sounding mad? Also see how I have related to crayons and fish scales what if I could not see anything to relate it to.
Let me give an example. A teacher is teaching a new system to a group of students. The teacher knows that the students have never used the system before and know nothing about it. The teacher will use lots of relations to already present knowledge the students know. The students know when they want something to happen something needs to be started, so the teacher would say to start the system we would do this. With out the knowledge of starting how would this be done? For this we can relate to pre school teaching. A teacher will teach the children about colours and words by breaking it up into very small parts such as showing cards with different colours and letters on them. This very basic teaching may or may not be needed to learn about something completely new.
We know the colour green is blue and yellow mixed together. A colour that does not exist in our reality may require additional colours. We only know the colours and how the colours are seen to use. If the lighting is different the colours are different. We know green is green because when we was young we was shown something that looked like it was green and we remembered its name. We do not know if everyone’s visual perception of the colour is the same. What if an extra colour was introduced into this new world that one could visit? How could someone explain it? One might ask if the colour like red or green. Well no because it is a completely new colour.
Science may say this is impossible to have an extra colour because it is all to do with wavelengths and such. We need to remind ourselves science is all guess work that has been proven to be true more than once. Science is making excuses to how stuff happened and that is all very well but it is not telling us the big answers we want to know like why are we here? Let us leave science to another post and get off of colour as well. Say you went to another world and this world was made out of what looked like crayons. The entire world is made out of little strips that colours that look like crayons. Trees are made out of tree scales that look like fish scales. The floor is solid and something out of a cartoon. How do you explain someone that world with out sounding mad? Also see how I have related to crayons and fish scales what if I could not see anything to relate it to.
Thursday, 23 July 2009
Is to die the meaning of life?
This was a meaning of life I was going to put onto my earlier post but felt it was too depressing. This is very depressing but I feel it could be a meaning of life anyway.
Death is seemly the highest probability of the human race as well as most if not everything else of this world. Everything ends. What if the point of life was to die? We have no memory of anything before our life and no one after it comes back. Ever had one of those dreams where your memory has been impaired and you think your someone else or somewhere else and it is natural? What if life was an illusion that had been created the same way? Before life there is something and after life there is something, in the same way before you wake up and after you go to sleep you dream. This does not mean the world is a dream just not all that there is.
There are lots of theories of after life and heaven if you are good or hell if you are bad. What if no matter what you did you just went to the next stage no matter what you did? If this is true then what would be the point in living? The big problem is we do not know if there is an afterlife because no one has come back. This could mean that there is no afterlife, it is not possible to come back or no one has ever wanted to come back. People have had accounts of near death experiences. I read once a story of a guy who ran out of air. He said although at first you are struggling to get air when you reach the point where you are about to pass out it is very familiar, almost as if you have experienced it before. It is like you feel you are floating although he was underwater at the time. The thing that made it sound interesting to me is how familiar he said it felt. Maybe we do come back and just do not remember.
This is not to say we can all kill ourselves or each other as we simply do not know. I started this post expecting this to be very depressing where as in all fairness the idea of going somewhere else is a lot less depressing to me then to just rot. Maybe when or although very unlikely I won’t but if I die maybe I will try get back. This post is not to recommend suicide at least not until strong proof has been found of after life.
Death is seemly the highest probability of the human race as well as most if not everything else of this world. Everything ends. What if the point of life was to die? We have no memory of anything before our life and no one after it comes back. Ever had one of those dreams where your memory has been impaired and you think your someone else or somewhere else and it is natural? What if life was an illusion that had been created the same way? Before life there is something and after life there is something, in the same way before you wake up and after you go to sleep you dream. This does not mean the world is a dream just not all that there is.
There are lots of theories of after life and heaven if you are good or hell if you are bad. What if no matter what you did you just went to the next stage no matter what you did? If this is true then what would be the point in living? The big problem is we do not know if there is an afterlife because no one has come back. This could mean that there is no afterlife, it is not possible to come back or no one has ever wanted to come back. People have had accounts of near death experiences. I read once a story of a guy who ran out of air. He said although at first you are struggling to get air when you reach the point where you are about to pass out it is very familiar, almost as if you have experienced it before. It is like you feel you are floating although he was underwater at the time. The thing that made it sound interesting to me is how familiar he said it felt. Maybe we do come back and just do not remember.
This is not to say we can all kill ourselves or each other as we simply do not know. I started this post expecting this to be very depressing where as in all fairness the idea of going somewhere else is a lot less depressing to me then to just rot. Maybe when or although very unlikely I won’t but if I die maybe I will try get back. This post is not to recommend suicide at least not until strong proof has been found of after life.
Sorry for late update
I had planned to update on Wednesday but failed to get a post together and have been upgrading my computer to a quad core. I hope to have a post up tonight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)